Couldnt have put it better myself.

A quote from someone who knows how local government works.Although it relates to Dorset it applies equally to our own rotten corrupt unelected council.

"The deep seated nature of this problem in regard to building stock is due in large part to the government itself, or their agents the councillors. For decades there has been a false assumption that councils knew what they were doing, and that councillors were honest. A check with the land registry will show that a good percentage of councillors in any particular district own a disproportionate amount of property. This is even more striking when one looks at the background and qualifications of councillors. The fact is that the opportunity to build up a property portfolio has been seen as a perk of the job, and in West Dorset at least two thirds of councillors are in it to manipulate the system. Add to this the District Councils cosy relationship with big builders who can satisfy targets in one fell swoop, and the problem is clear. If the government were serious and decided to scrutinise their 'agents' they would find sufficient criminality to lock some of them up."

Read more here.

Heres Wally.

Here is a picture of the latest unelected ones assimilated into the great leaders hive.

The one on the far right is Andrew(invisible man) Steen who seems as reluctant to have his picture on the councils website as he does to share his background and beliefs with us the residents of Crowborough East Ward who he thinks he represents .Our other East Ward non representative unelected representatives are Peter (£3million overdraft)Cowie,David(Lib Dum) Shaw and Sandra(twee)Timms none of which have been voted in just like 7/8ths of the council.

Where are the wallys?

East Ward- Andrew Steen
North Ward- Ronald Reed
West Ward- Quentin Burch Michael Cooke Wendy Scrace.

These are the new unelected members of the council that were so keen to represent the people of the town that they all waited until they could sneak in by the open back door called co option.I expected them to at least make a pretence over representing us by telling us who they are and what their political beliefs are but since being co opted we have silence.I presume they are not allowed to think for themselves or speak without our inglorious leaders say so and until they have completed their NLP brainwashing courtesy of Wealden.I mean how difficult can it be to actually find out what the residents concerns are and articulate those concerns in a democratic manner.Considering the fact that the Town Council is not democratic in any shape or form I suppose the "representing the residents" bit is also a bit beyond their remit these days.
We all need to keep our eyes open and see if we can spot the newly co opted wallys around the town asking the good people of the town what they think on issues before spouting out the inglorious leaders proclamations.

Crowborough Town Council Führerprinzip.

Just so we know where we stand on the democracy front in Crowborough I am updating the list of Councillors that have been voted in by the electorate. They are ...

•Elizabeth M Fermor
•Beverley A Johnstone

There now follows a list of people who have not been voted in by the electorate and therefore hold the position of councillor with no lawful mandate from the people they fraudulently claim to represent.

•Peter J Cowie
•David M Shaw
•Sandra E Timms
•Philip J Fermor
•George Moss
•Neil H Waller
•Paul Adams
•Matthew Street
•Kay J Moss

So we are in a position whereby out of a total of 11 members only 2 have been voted in.It is a disgrace that our armed forces are fighting in foreign lands to bring democracy and freedom to foreign people when we are being denied the same rights at home.
Democracy is a form of government under which the power to alter the laws and structures of government lies, ultimately, with the citizenry. Under such a system, legislative decisions are made by the people themselves or by representatives who act through the consent of the people, as enforced by elections and the rule of law. Using this as the accepted definition of democracy it is clear that the Town Council is not a democratic organisation and has no legitimacy either morally or literally.Taking Afghanistan,Iraq,Libya etc as examples perhaps the current undemocratic usurpers should be given the ultimatum of leaving peacefully or be removed by force to be replaced by a fully elected democratic body .
We can now see why the council was none to keen to advertise for people to come forward as potential councillors to stand at the recent council elections.They figured that if none comes forward they could remain as councillors without having to face the residents and fight for their votes with the added benefit of installing more "chosen ones" as co opted members that have to meet with the approval of the unelected fuhrer Mayoress.
Read these small extracts about the principles of government during the third reich and you can see alarming similarities with the situation in the town today.
The Führerprinzip [ˈfyːʀɐpʀɪnˌtsiːp] ( listen), German for "leader principle", prescribes the fundamental basis of political authority in the governmental structures of the Third Reich. This principle can be most succinctly understood to mean that "the Führer's word is above all written law" and that governmental policies, decisions, and offices ought to work toward the realization of this end.The Führerprinzip was not invented by the National Socialists. Hermann Graf Keyserling, a German philosopher, was the first to use the term "Führerprinzip". One of Keyserling's central claims was that certain 'gifted individuals' were "born to rule" on the basis of Social Darwinism.
The ideology of the Führerprinzip sees each organization as a hierarchy of leaders, where every leader (Führer, in German) has absolute responsibility in his own area, demands absolute obedience from those below him and answers only to his superiors.